Paragon Health Institute Icon White

Immigration and Health Care in the One Big Beautiful Bill: How the New Law Reforms Eligibility for Medicaid, Medicare, and ACA Subsidies

1AW Shutterstock 24800639970
Brian Blase
President at Paragon Health Institute

Brian Blase, Ph.D., is the President of Paragon Health Institute. Brian was Special Assistant to the President for Economic Policy at the White House’s National Economic Council (NEC) from 2017-2019, where he coordinated the development and execution of numerous health policies and advised the President, NEC director, and senior officials. After leaving the White House, Brian founded Blase Policy Strategies and served as its CEO.

1AW Ryan Long Headshot SMALLER
Ryan Long is the Director of Congressional Relations and a Senior Research Fellow at Paragon Health Institute. In this role he is the leading voice communicating Paragon’s research and proposals to Congress by connecting with and educating policymakers and their staffs and leading the Congressional Health Policy Education Program. As a researcher, Long produces original papers and policy briefs promoting consumer choice, market competition, and innovation in healthcare markets. These publications focus on regulatory and policy reforms to ensure a sustainable and innovative health care system.

This brief examines the provisions of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) that address federal funding for health services for unauthorized immigrants and certain legal immigrants in Medicaid, Medicare, and the Affordable Care Act (ACA). These provisions seek to restrict federally subsidized coverage to U.S. citizens and certain lawful residents.

For Medicaid, Medicare, and the ACA, this brief summarizes pre-OBBBA law around health coverage for non-citizens, the relevant provisions of OBBBA (and what the law omits), and the expected impact.

Key Takeaways

  • OBBBA restricts federally subsidized health benefits. It limits Medicaid, Medicare, and ACA subsidies to U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, Cuban/Haitian entrants, and individuals under Compacts of Free Association.
  • The bill ends enhanced federal reimbursement for unauthorized immigrants’ emergency services and tightens program integrity rules, closing loopholes that previously allowed improper enrollment.
  • CBO projects more than $200 billion in federal savings over the next decade from OBBB provisions that tighten immigrant eligibility for Medicaid, Medicare, and the ACA.
  • Several House-passed provisions were dropped in the Senate, including stronger penalties on states covering unauthorized immigrants, but OBBBA still marks the most significant reform of immigrant eligibility for federal health benefits in decades.

Medicaid Rules Before and After OBBBA

Pre-OBBBA

Medicaid could pay for services for legal immigrants, and, in some cases, the federal government could pay for emergency care for unauthorized immigrants.

The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA), signed by President Clinton, allowed certain “qualified aliens” to access welfare (including Medicaid) while excluding non-qualified aliens. Under PRWORA, lawful permanent residents were still required to wait five years before becoming eligible for Medicaid. However, those entering the United States illegally who claimed asylum or were released with grants of parole were eligible for Medicaid immediately. Under the Biden administration, millions of unauthorized aliens abused these designations to stay in the country longer1 and were thus able to enroll in Medicaid. As of 2023, previously eligible qualified aliens (noncitizens) comprised 6 percent of individuals under the age of 65 with Medicaid, or approximately 4.6 million people.2

Regarding unauthorized immigrants, there have been some circumstances in which the federal government paid for their emergency care. Generally, federal law does not reimburse states for Medicaid services to unauthorized immigrants. If states wish to have Medicaid cover services for unauthorized immigrants, they must pay for that coverage with state-only dollars. As Paragon has documented, states such as California circumvented this restriction using legalized money laundering techniques to obtain federal Medicaid dollars, which they then used on medical services for unauthorized immigrants.3

States are also affected by the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, which requires4 that if an individual shows up to the hospital with an emergency medical condition, hospitals must either provide stabilization treatment or transfer the individual to another medical facility. This rule applies regardless of immigration status.

Whether or not Medicaid pays for these services, however, relates to another provision of law. Section 1903 of the Social Security Act generally prohibits federal reimbursement for services received by anyone who is not a lawful permanent resident. However, the law specifically makes an exception and allows payments for non-lawful permanent residents if the following two conditions are met:

  1. The services “are necessary for the treatment of an emergency medical condition of the alien.”5
  2. The alien meets the state’s other eligibility requirements.6

This exception created a situation in which the federal government was required to pay for emergency services for unauthorized immigrants at a higher rate than for citizens if states chose to (a) expand Medicaid under the ACA and (b) expand its program with state-only dollars to include unauthorized immigrants. Non-expansion states receive the normal federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP, typically around 60 percent) for their emergency services.

Some states that expanded Medicaid under the ACA also expanded the program to provide comprehensive Medicaid benefits to unauthorized immigrants. As of April 2025, seven states (California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, New York, Oregon, and Washington) and the District of Columbia had expanded fully state-funded coverage to some income-eligible adults regardless of immigration status.7 So if an unauthorized immigrant has access to an expansion state’s Medicaid program as part of the expansion population, the federal government must reimburse his or her emergency room care at the 90 percent FMAP. Thus, the law results in the federal government making Medicaid reimbursements to states for able-bodied unauthorized immigrants at a much higher FMAP (90 percent) than U.S. citizens in the traditional, more vulnerable population in most of these states (50 percent FMAP). Thus, the federal government spent nearly nine times more for each dollar of state spending on the able-bodied unauthorized immigrants’ emergency services than for state spending for traditional enrollees’ emergency services.

What OBBBA Did and Did Not Do

Beginning October 1, 2026, Section 71109 of OBBBA prohibits the federal government from reimbursing states for Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) for anyone other than:

  • citizens,
  • lawful permanent residents,
  • Cuban and Haitian entrants, and
  • individuals lawfully residing in the United States through a Compact of Free Association.

States will be ineligible for federal Medicaid funds for services received by refugees, aliens granted parole for at least one year, aliens granted asylum, and “alien visitors, tourists, diplomats, and students who enter the United States temporarily with no intention of abandoning their residence in a foreign country.”11 The statute still allows federal reimbursement for emergency services and, per states’ election, children and pregnant women who lawfully reside in the United States.12

To address emergency care, Section 71110 of OBBBA reduces the FMAP from 90 percent to the state’s normal FMAP for emergency medical services provided through Medicaid for unauthorized immigrants—effective October 1, 2026. This section does not eliminate Medicaid funding emergency services for unauthorized immigrants. It simply ensures the federal match for unauthorized immigrants does not exceed that for citizens.

Medicaid House-Enacted Elements Dropped in the Senate

This final version of OBBBA excluded or changed two Medicaid sections related to immigration that the U.S. House of Representatives originally passed.

Originally, Section 44111 of the House-passed version would have reduced the 90 percent expansion FMAP by 10 percentage points for all states that cover unauthorized immigrants through Medicaid or fund unauthorized immigrants’ medical services through state-based government programs. Congressional Democrats argued that this provision was not compliant with Senate reconciliation rules, and the parliamentarian agreed. The House-passed version would have forced states such as California to maintain programs for unauthorized immigrants or receive a 10-percentage point reduction in the FMAP for expansion enrollees. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) previously estimated that this policy would have reduced coverage by 1.4 million people because it assumed states would curtail their coverage of unauthorized immigrants rather than face a reduction in their 90 percent FMAP.8 When this policy was first announced, Governor Gavin Newsom of California announced that the state would pause new enrollments for unauthorized immigrants and start requiring premium payments for those who were already enrolled.9 Even after the final OBBBA changed this provision, Governor Newsom still finalized the policy on June 27, signing a budget that required adult unauthorized immigrants to pay a $30 monthly premium.10

Similarly, the House-passed version included Section 44110, which would have prohibited federal reimbursement under Medicaid and CHIP for enrollees without verified citizenship, nationality, or satisfactory immigration status. It would have specifically ended federal funding when an individual’s citizenship or immigration status had not been verified. States would have been able to provide coverage during a reasonable verification opportunity period. However, this provision would have restricted federal dollars until the applicant’s citizenship or immigration status was verified.

Projected Impact

According to CBO, between 2017 and 2023, the federal government paid a total of $9 billion “on emergency Medicaid services for non‑U.S. nationals who were ineligible for comprehensive Medicaid by reason of immigration status or because they were still within the five-year waiting period.”13 CBO projects that over 10 years, Section 71109 will save $6.2 billion while Section 71110 will save $28.0 billion. CBO did not release coverage estimates specific to these provisions.

Medicare’s Revised Eligibility Rules

Pre-OBBBA

The statute explicitly authorized Medicare to allow certain noncitizens to access the program. For both Medicare Parts A and B, an individual could only access benefits if he or she was a “resident of the United States, and is either (A) a citizen or (B) an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence.”14 While the statute allowed those groups onto the Medicare program, the statute did not specifically prohibit other groups from joining the program. Thus, certain non-permanent residents have still accessed Medicare.15

What OBBBA Did and Did Not Do

Section 71201 restricts Medicare eligibility to U.S. citizens, aliens who are “lawfully admitted for permanent residence under the Immigration and Nationality Act,” Cuban and Haitian entrants, and individuals lawfully residing in the United States under Compacts of Free Association.

This section also requires the Commissioner of Social Security to review individuals enrolled in Medicare who do not meet the new criteria and to notify them that their enrollment is terminated.

Projected Impact

CBO estimates that this section will save $5 billion over 10 years. This section takes effect on January 1, 2027. CBO has not released specific estimates on how this provision would affect coverage.

ACA Subsidies and Closing Loopholes

Pre-OBBBA

The ACA prohibits “individuals who are not lawfully present” from receiving ACA subsidies.16 But many individuals who are here legally but are not permanent residents (parolees, asylees) are eligible for a premium tax credit (PTC) to purchase exchange plans. Data from the Urban Institute indicates that in 2024 approximately 4.0 percent of noncitizens were insured with exchange plans and received PTCs, while an additional 1.7 percent of noncitizens were enrolled in the Basic Health Program (BHP).17 Under Section 1331 of the ACA, BHPs receive federal funding.18 States with the largest asylee populations are California, Texas, Virginia, New York, and Florida.19

The ACA permitted certain qualified aliens20 to enroll in the ACA, even though U.S. policy includes a waiting period for new immigrants before they can enroll in federally subsidized health care. PRWORA imposed a five-year period before qualified aliens would be eligible to enroll in Medicaid (with exceptions).21 However, the ACA allowed those affected to bypass the PRWORA waiting period to obtain a PTC, even if they earn less than 100 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL). Below is a list of the “qualified aliens” listed in Title 8, Section 1641, of the U.S. Code that do not get exceptions (listed in Title 8, Section 1613(b)) and would thus be affected by this waiting period:

  • Lawfully admitted permanent residents
  • Parolees after 1 year
  • Those granted conditional entry22

Section 36B(c)(1)(B) of the ACA included individuals who make less than 100 percent FPL and who are not eligible for Medicaid due to their alien status as “applicable individuals.” This ACA provision directly opened the door for those in the Medicaid waiting period (listed above) to receive PTCs (regardless of length of residency) even if their incomes are below 100 percent of FPL in non-Medicaid-expansion states and below 138 percent FPL in Medicaid expansion states. Defining applicable individual to include this group allows them to receive PTCs, a benefit not legally available to U.S. citizens who make below 100 percent FPL. In other words, non-U.S. citizens are the only individuals who can legally obtain PTCs if their incomes are below 138 percent FPL in Medicaid expansion states or 100 percent FPL in non-Medicaid expansion states.

Although we could not find estimates of how many noncitizens receive PTCs in the United States, below is a non-exhaustive list of certain groups of noncitizens who, depending on whether they also fall under an exception, might have qualified for the ACA’s authorization to access PTCs:

  • 12.8 million lawfully permanent residents, as of January 1, 202423
  • 1 million individuals with Temporary Protected Status24
  • 531,690 individuals in the Cuban, Haitian, Nicaraguan, and Venezuelan parole program25
  • 169,000 individuals with U Visas or Special Immigrant Juvenile Status26
  • 651,000 Ukrainian parolees27
  • 133,000 Afghan parolees28
  • 535,030 individuals with Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)29

Prior to OBBBA, automatic re-enrollment facilitated widespread improper and even fraudulent ACA enrollment.30 In addition to putting many people at risk of accumulating tax liabilities, automatic re-enrollment also ensured the continuance of large subsidy payments for those who were ineligibly enrolled at any point in time.

What OBBBA Did and Did Not Do

Section 71301 of OBBBA further limits which aliens can qualify for PTCs. Like OBBBA’s restrictions on Medicaid (see Section 71109 above), the only noncitizens who can get PTCs are lawful permanent residents, Cuban and Haitian entrants, and individuals lawfully residing in the United States under Compacts of Free Association.

This section amends the ACA to require the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to verify whether an individual is an “eligible alien,” as defined by Section 36B(e)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. It also amends the code to:

  • require anyone who claims an advanced PTC or reduced cost-sharing and who is eligible based on immigration status to also attest that he or she is an “eligible alien”;
  • require the Secretary to include information regarding whether enrollees are “eligible aliens” when he submits records to DHS to determine eligibility; and
  • prohibit any payments, credits, or cost-sharing reductions for individuals who are not “eligible aliens” rather than “not lawfully present.”31

OBBBA also addresses the Medicaid-waiting-list loophole in Section 71302 by removing the policy that currently allows lawful permanent residents, parolees, and those granted conditional entry to receive PTCs if their income is below the FPL in non-expansion states or below 138 percent FPL in expansion states.

Furthermore, Section 71303 will prevent those already enrolled from automatically receiving APTCs by requiring exchanges to verify eligibility for PTCs before enrollment and every year afterward. This policy essentially restores a basic program integrity measure  reversed under the Biden administration. It requires an individual to affirm that he or she is in an eligible alien status.

ACA House-Enacted Elements Dropped in the Senate

When it comes to what OBBBA did not include, the final version excluded a House-passed Section 44201, which would have, among other reforms, excluded DACA recipients from the definition of lawfully present, which would thereby exclude them from accessing APTCs. Ultimately, the Trump administration made this change administratively in its June 2025 Program Integrity and Marketplace Affordability rule.32 This change came in response to a Biden administration policy that undid long-standing HHS policy and defined DACA recipients as “lawfully present.”33 The Biden administration’s change allowed DACA recipients to enroll in ACA coverage and qualify for subsidies. It is estimated this eligibility expansion would extend coverage to nearly 100,000 otherwise uninsured DACA recipients.

Policy now has returned to the historical stance by excluding DACA recipients from the definition of lawfully present, thus making them ineligible to receive ACA subsidies. Today, nearly half of DACA recipients live in California and Texas.34

Projected Fiscal Impacts

CBO projects substantial savings from OBBBA’s provisions that restrict unauthorized immigrant eligibility for federally subsidized health programs. Section 71109 limits Medicaid and CHIP reimbursement to citizens, lawful permanent residents, Cuban and Haitian entrants, and those covered under Compacts of Free Association. Section 71110 reduces the enhanced federal match for emergency services provided to unauthorized immigrants from 90 percent to the state’s regular FMAP. Section 71201 narrows Medicare eligibility to the same limited groups, with the Social Security Administration required to terminate enrollment for individuals who no longer qualify. Together, CBO estimates these three provisions will save $39.2 billion over ten years.

The largest projected savings come from OBBBA’s reforms to the Affordable Care Act. Section 71301 tightens the definition of who may receive PTCs, restricting subsidies to lawful permanent residents, Cuban and Haitian entrants, and Compact migrants, with expected savings of $74.5 billion. Section 71302 closes the loophole that allowed certain noncitizens in the Medicaid waiting period to bypass restrictions and access ACA subsidies, saving $49.7 billion. Section 71303 ends automatic re-enrollment into subsidized exchange plans without verification of immigration eligibility, saving $41.3 billion. Altogether, these three sections account for more than $165 billion in projected deficit reduction over the next decade, making them the most significant fiscal components of OBBBA’s immigration provisions. The actual level of savings will depend heavily on the size of the affected populations. If current data undercounts unauthorized immigrants or other ineligible individuals, the potential savings would likely be greater than projected.

Key Immigration Terms Used in this Brief

  • Aliens: “Any persons [who are] not citizen[s] or nationals of the United States as defined in section 101(a)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act…. This term may include stateless persons and is synonymous with ‘foreign nationals.’”35
  • Legal Immigrant: This term refers to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) definition of immigrant: “Any person lawfully in the United States who is not a U.S. citizen, U.S. national, or person admitted under a nonimmigrant category as defined by the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) section 101(a)(15).”36
  • Unauthorized Immigrants: This term refers to the population that DHS defines as the “unauthorized alien population.” According to DHS, this group consists of “[a]liens who are not legal residents, including naturalized citizens, persons granted lawful permanent residence, persons granted asylum, persons admitted as refugees, and persons admitted as resident nonimmigrants (i.e., students and temporary workers, as opposed to tourists) who have unexpired authorized periods of admission.”37
  • Qualified Aliens: “[Aliens] who, at the time they [apply] for, receive, or [attempt] to receive a Federal public benefit, [are] (1) … lawfully admitted for permanent residence under the Immigration and Nationality Act, (2) … granted asylum under section 208 of such Act, (3) refugees who are admitted to the United States under section 207 of such Act, (4) … paroled into the United States under section 212(d)(5) of such Act for a period of at least 1 year, (5) … whose deportation is being withheld under section 243(h) of such Act, (6) granted conditional entry pursuant to section 203(a)(7) of such Act as in effect prior to April 1, 1980, (7) who are a Cuban and Haitian entrant (as defined in section 501(e) of the Refugee Education Assistance Act of 1980), or (8) individuals who lawfully reside in the United States in accordance with a Compact of Free Association.”38
  • Lawful Permanent Residents: “Alien[s] who [are] living in the United States under legally recognized and lawfully recorded permanent residence as immigrants. Also known as ‘permanent resident aliens,’ ‘resident alien permit holders,’ and ‘Green Card holders.’”39
  • Parolees: “Alien[s], appearing to be inadmissible to the inspecting officer, allowed into the United States for urgent humanitarian reasons or when [these] aliens[’] entry is determined to be for significant public benefit. Parole does not constitute a formal admission to the United States and confers temporary status only, requiring parolees to leave when the conditions supporting their parole cease to exist.”40
  • Asylees: “Alien[s] in the United States or at a port of entry who [are] unable or unwilling to return to their country of nationality, or to seek the protection of that country because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution. Persecution or the fear of persecution must be based on [race,] religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion.”41
  • Refugees: Aliens who, “prior to [their] departure for and arrival in the United States, [have] been determined by competent authority to be fleeing persecution or have a well-founded fear of persecution in their own country because of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion.”42
  • Individuals Under Compacts of Free Association: “Individuals from the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM), the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI), and the Republic of Palau (Palau) [who] may be admitted to the United States and its territories and possessions as nonimmigrants to lawfully engage in occupations and establish residence for [the] duration of [their] stay.”43
  • Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Recipients: Aliens receiving “a discretionary determination to defer [deportation]” who are “authorized by DHS to be in the United States for the duration of the deferred action period.” Such recipients are “considered to be lawfully present … for purposes of eligibility for certain public benefits” during the period of their deferred action. “However, deferred action does not confer lawful immigration status upon recipients, nor does it excuse any previous or subsequent periods of unlawful presence they may have.”44

Footnotes

1 U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary. H. Rept. 118-47 (118th Cong., 1st Sess.): Border Security and Enforcement Act of 2023 (to accompany H.R. 2640) (pp. 36?41). May 4, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/committee-report/118th-congress/house-report/47/1?outputFormat=pdf
2 Samantha Artiga et al., "5 Key Facts About Immigrants and Medicaid," KFF, February 19, 2025, https://www.kff.org/racial-equity-and-health-policy/issue-brief/5-key-facts-about-immigrants-and-medicaid/
3 Specifically, states and providers work together. The state taxes providers, uses that money to increase rates (which gives the appearance of state expenditures), and obtains federal money through the federal reimbursement. Both the states and providers split the federal reimbursement. Paul Winfree and Brian Blase, "California's Insurance-Tax Shuffle: How Federal Money Ends Up Paying for Medicaid for Illegal Immigrants," Paragon Health Institute, March 12, 2025, https://paragoninstitute.org/medicaid/californias-insurance-tax-shuffle-how-federal-money-ends-up-paying-for-medicaid-for-illegal-immigrants/
4 See 42 U.S.C. ? 1395dd(b).
5 Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. ? 1903(v)(2)(A).
6 Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. ? 1903(v)(2)(B).
7 Akash Pillai et al., "State Health Coverage for Immigrants and Implications for Health Coverage and Care," KFF, May 1, 2024, https://www.kff.org/racial-equity-and-health-policy/issue-brief/state-health-coverage-for-immigrants-and-implications-for-health-coverage-and-care/
8 Congressional Budget Office, letter to the Hon. Jodey Arrington and the Hon. Brett Guthrie, June 24, 2025, www.cbo.gov/system/files/2025-06/Arrington-Guthrie-Letter-Medicaid.pdf.
9 Kristen Hwang and Ana B. Ibarra, "Newsom Proposes to Freeze Medi-Cal Enrollment for Undocumented Immigrants," CalMatters, May 14, 2025, https://calmatters.org/health/2025/05/newsom-freeze-medi-cal-undocumented-immigrants/
10 Laurel Rosenhall, "Newsom Signs Budget That Includes Health Care Cuts for Undocumented Immigrants," New York Times, June 27, 2025, https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/27/us/newsom-budget-immigrant-health.html
11 42 U.S.C. ? 1396b(v)(5)(B)(ii).
12 42 U.S.C. ? 1396b(v)(5), which carves out exceptions in paragraphs (2) and (4) that allow reimbursement for emergency services and pregnant women/children respectively.
14 For Parts A and B respectively, this language is located in Title 42, Sections 1395i-2(a) and 1395o(a), of the U.S. Code.
15 National Immigration Law Center, "Overview of Immigrant Eligibility for Federal Programs," April 1, 2024, https://www.nilc.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tbl1_ovrvw-fed-pgms-rev-2024-04-1.pdf; Center for Medicare Advocacy, "'Big Beautiful Bill' Would Strip Medicare from Some Lawfully Present Immigrants, Threatening Health and Economic Security," June 18, 2025, https://medicareadvocacy.org/bill-would-take-medicare-from-some-who-have-paid-in-for-decades/
16 Sections 1312(f)(3), 1401, 1402(e), and 1412(d) of the ACA.
17 Matthew Buettgens and Urmi Ramchandani, "The Health Coverage of Noncitizens in the United States, 2024," Urban Institute, May 4, 2023, https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/2023-05/The%20Health%20Coverage%20of%20Noncitizens%20in%20the%20United%20States%202024.pdf
18 Medicaid.gov, "Basic Health Program," June 2025, https://www.medicaid.gov/basic-health-program
19 Noah Schofield and Amanda Yap, "Asylees: 2023," DHS, Office of Homeland Security Statistics, October 1, 2024, https://ohss.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/2024_1002_ohss_asylees_fy2023.pdf
20 8 U.S.C. ? 1641?Definitions.
21 8 U.S.C. ? 1613(a).
22 Under Section 203(a)(7) of such act as in effect prior to April 1, 1980.
23 Sarah Miller, "Estimates of the Lawful Permanent Resident Population in the United States and the Subpopulation Eligible to Naturalize: 2024 and Revised 2023," DHS, Office of Homeland Security Statistics, September 2024, https://ohss.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2024-11/2024_1108_ohss_lawful_permenent_resident_population_estimate_2024_and_revised_2023.pdf
24 National Immigration Forum, "Temporary Protected Status (TPS): Fact Sheet," July 10, 2025, https://immigrationforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Temporary-Protected-Status-Fact-Sheet-July-10-2025.pdf
25 Daniel Costa, "Trump Attacks on Temporary Immigration Protections Like TPS Hurt the Economy and Strip Millions of Their Workplace Rights," Economic Policy Institute, May 12, 2025, https://www.epi.org/blog/trump-attacks-on-temporary-immigration-protections-like-tps-hurt-the-economy-and-strip-millions-of-their-workplace-rights/
26 Costa, "Trump Attacks."
27 National Foundation for American Policy, "2.7 Million People Could Lose TPS, DACA, and Humanitarian Parole," October 2024, https://nfap.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/TPS-And-Humanitarian-Parole-Numbers.NFAP-Policy-Brief.2024.pdf
28 National Foundation for American Policy, "2.7 Million People."
29 National Foundation for American Policy, "2.7 Million People."
30 Brian Blase et al., "The Greater Obamacare Enrollment Fraud: The Fraud Got Much Worse in 2025," Paragon Health Institute, June 2025, https://paragoninstitute.org/private-health/the-greater-obamacare-enrollment-fraud/
31 This prohibition was added to Section 1412(d) of the ACA (42 U.S.C. ? 18082(d)).
32 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, "2025 Marketplace Integrity and Affordability Final Rule," June 20, 2025, https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/2025-marketplace-integrity-and-affordability-final-rule
33 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, "Biden-Harris Administration Finalizes Policies to Increase Access to Health Coverage for DACA Recipients," press release, May 3, 2024, https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/biden-harris-administration-finalizes-policies-increase-access-health-coverage-daca-recipients
34 USCIS, "Active DACA Recipients?Fiscal Year 2025, Quarter 2," June 30, 2025, https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/data/daca_performancedata_fy2025_q2.xlsx
35 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), "Glossary," July 1, 2025, https://www.uscis.gov/tools/glossary
36 U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Office of Homeland Security Statistics, "Glossary," June 13, 2025, https://ohss.dhs.gov/glossary
37 DHS, "Glossary."
38 Cornell Law School, "8 U.S. Code ? 1641?Definitions," March 2024, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1641
39 USCIS, "Glossary."
40 DHS, "Glossary."
41 USCIS, "Glossary."
42 DHS, "Glossary."
43 U.S. Department of the Interior, "The Compacts of Free Association and Living in the United States," September 16, 2024, https://www.doi.gov/oia/COFAinUS
44 USCIS, "Consideration of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA): Frequently Asked Questions," January 24, 2025, https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/consideration-of-deferred-action-for-childhood-arrivals-daca/frequently-asked-questions

Subscribe

Sign up now for your health policy updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name(Required)